Do We Really Want our Hospital to Remain in or Adjacent to Easton? Are We Willing to Fight the Good Fight or Will Apathy Once Again Reign Supreme in Talbot County?
How is it possible that local residents who are members of our community and members of the Board of Directors of Easton Memorial Hospital could cave in to pressures from the likes of Shore Health executive management and University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS) and “agree” to “STUDY” the future disposition of our hospital in Easton? This is probably the worst contrived and conceived notion I have been in direct contact with in more than 50 years of professional and business experiences. This effort, were it to continue down its intended and stated path, must be guided by planning principles that make sense for the citizens of Talbot County – first and foremost, for the Mid Shore as a whole, and for the business prospects of Shore Health System (SHS) and UMMS as well.
What results have emerged as a result of going directly to University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS)? It would be good to hear them describe their business plans and health care delivery vision for the future.
If they are (or could be persuaded to) be interested in including a research arm, or an advanced Veterans Affairs full-service clinic, or a wellness center, or a medical or allied health school, cardiac, oncology, “other similar centers, or medical entities that would not only create a regional medical center but a true center of excellence. Why shouldn’t we talk with Senator Mikulski (D-MD), who is an appropriator, and Senator Cardin (D-MD), who is from Baltimore and would more than likely be interested in supporting funds to expand UMMS’ capabilities, as well as location. A big plus is that Senator Cardin is a health care expert. It is nearly too late - but not quite - to put in an “ask” for an appropriation this year. I think the House deadline is March 18th, but I can’t recall the Senate’s, their’s is not too much later. Congressman Jack Murtha has populated his hometown, Johnstown, PA, with more health care facilities, schools, and other job-creating entities that you can count. This approach could engage Governor O’Malley, who could also take credit for enhancing UMMS, Talbot County, and surrounding counties, if Cardin likes the idea. This approach would also create jobs, possibly new higher education, or some new destination center (diagnostic, cardiac, oncology, gerontology, or whatever UMMS wants), like the Cleveland clinic, and ensure local and quality health care delivery for the Eastern Shore as well as Talbot County.
The position of Shore Health System on issues regarding a possible relocation of Easton Memorial Hospital is suspect at best in my mind. Due to non-attribution the following quoted material is extremely important for all to know in my view. [quote] “I think you will find that the reaction of most in the audience reflects what you (re: speaking to an Easton Memorial Hospital Administrator) will hear from others in the community as time goes forward.
In any event, it seemed reassuring to hear stated that (1) any decision to relocate the hospital will be made by the local SHS board, and not by the University of Maryland Medical System or its directors (a face value statement I do NOT accept); and, (2) the SHS board intends that any relocation of the hospital will occur in Talbot County, at a site yet to be determined, and that a Queen Anne’s County site is “off the table.”
I suspect all of us would like to rely on those assurances, but regrettably we continue to get conflicting signals.
In the Star Democrat it was reported recently that the chairman of the board of Chester River Health System (Mr MacLeod), who right now is in face-to-face negotiations with UMMS, has been provided with a vision for the future of our hospital that is different from what described by SHS management recently. Specifically, Mr. MacLeod states that, based on what he has been told by UMMS, “they have a vision for an Upper Shore health care system with a new hospital somewhere in northern Talbot County or Queen Anne’s.”
So apparently UMMS has advised Mr. MacLeod that, contrary to what we heard from SHS management not so very long ago, a Queen Anne’s County site is not “off the table,” and to the extent a site in Talbot County is selected it will be “somewhere in northern Talbot County.” It seems that UMMS is not interested in other sites in or adjacent to Easton, even though we were advised by SHS management other such sites are under consideration.
So you must forgive me if I, and likely others, remain dubious about what we have been hearing and NOT hearing about the future of Easton Memorial Hospital. I think most of us find it rather unlikely that the SHS board in fact will have autonomy in deciding where to relocate the hospital, given the political and financial muscle of UMMS. Regrettably, since the merger agreement will not be made publicly available, there is no way to reassure Talbot citizens that the ultimate decision in fact will be a local one.
Mr. MacLeod’s comments about the future of CRHS, as part of the UMMS system, sound eerily familiar. He assured the Chestertown mayor that “without question, this hospital will be here” if the merger goes through. Mr. Dillon of course made precisely the same statement in his last interview, stating that there is “no sense on the board of replacing or abandoning Memorial Hospital.”
But we learned from SHS management several weeks ago that all of this depends upon what is the meaning of “hospital”. We were given no assurance that what most of this community would consider the “hospital” to be – that is, the 125 acute care medical/surgical beds – in fact – will remain in or around Easton as part of a realignment. I suspect that if Mr. MacLeod were pressed, he too would admit that the “hospital” that supposedly will remain in Chestertown would not necessarily be the equivalent of what Chestertown residents consider their “hospital” to be.
So while SHS willingness to talk about the subject surely is appreciated, it appears that significantly conflicting versions of future plans and intentions continue to circulate. One way to address this would be to lift the veil of secrecy that covers the “search committee,” at least to the extent of divulging the membership of that group. Failing that, I think much more candor is needed if we are to be persuaded that we can rely upon the statements of intention that we heard last night.” [end quote from attendee at the Avalon]
So, if we get motivated and engaged, as we must, assuming we want our hospital to stay in Easton’s town limits, what should be said? Here are my suggestions as talking points, you fill in the blanks where needed:
RSS feed
